When I read the first few pages of Heart of Darkness over the weekend, I was a little confused without the historical context being explicitly stated. If anyone else had that problem at first, read the intro! I know no one likes to do reading that isn’t specifically assigned, but being that this book seems pretty grounded it somewhat realistic historical nature, I think the intro is worth checking out. It definitely cleared things up for me, it’s helpful for sure.
beenjamin-y on The Preterite and the Ele… John on The Adenoid and Nazi Germ… Guadalajara –… on The Preterite and the Ele… Alan Schultz on Death Battle: Marx vs. Ma… Gravity’s Rain… on The Séance of Walter Rath…
Tagsantonio marquez Authenticity Banana Breakfast Bibliography Biography Bleeding Edge Boris Kachka Chapman lighthouse character map characters Chinua Achebe christopher lee cinema cinematic imagination Crash and Burn die frau im mond fay wray film film theory fire of paradise Friedrich Nietzsche fritz lang fu manchu Games of Truth Gravity's Rainbow Gravity's Rainbow Criticism Gravity's Rainbow plot groucho marx Heart of Darkness i'll say she is Illustration Introduction to Critical Reading Ivory jessica John E. Badass Joseph Conrad Kabbalah katje Kurtz Marlow marx brothers meggezone Metatron metropolis Michel Foucault On Truth and LYing in a Nonmoral Sense Paranoia parrhesia PhD Pop Culture psychology Pynchon Pynchon Criticism reference Research Rob Horning roger sax rohmer Slothrop Social Media Sparky Sweets statistics summary Svati Kirsten Narula The Atlantic theatre The New Inquiry Thomas Pynchon Thug Notes true self Truth tyrone slothrop Vheissu Vulture Zak Smith